top of page
Understanding the Electoral College

KEY TAKEAWAYS:

  • The Electoral College, a pivotal institution in the American political system, holds the key to the election of the President and Vice President.

The Electoral College, a pivotal institution in the American political system, holds the key to the election of the President and Vice President. Its establishment by the framers of the United States Constitution, a momentous decision, is a testament to the principles of federalism, compromise, and the need to balance the interests of both large and small states. This group, appointed by each state (and the District of Columbia), is responsible for the formal election of the President and Vice President.


The origins of the Electoral College can be traced back to the Constitutional Convention of 1787 in Philadelphia, a time when the nation was grappling with the complexities of its establishment. The founders faced a dilemma: whether to allow Congress, the state legislatures, or the people themselves to elect the President directly. In this context, the Electoral College was devised as a mechanism to strike a balance between the will of the people and the sovereignty of the states.


Each state would be allocated a number of electors equal to its representation in Congress, combining the number of U.S. Senators (two for each state) and U.S. Representatives (based on population). This formula, a testament to the Electoral College's commitment to fairness, aimed to prevent domination by populous states while still granting them significant influence - it also ensured smaller states were not discounted.


Since 1964, there have been 538 electors in each presidential election. This equals the number of U.S. senators (100), U.S. representatives (435), and three electors from the District of Columbia.


The Electoral College operates on a winner-takes-all basis in most states, incentivizing presidential candidates to focus their campaign efforts on battleground states where the outcome is uncertain, and they can secure even a small margin of victory. This system, in essence, amplifies the impact of the popular vote within a state, as the candidate who wins the popular vote usually receives all its electoral votes.


On the Monday after the second Wednesday in December following the presidential election, electors gather in their respective state capitals to cast their votes. These votes are then transmitted to Congress, where they are officially counted during a joint session in early January. The candidate who receives a majority of electoral votes (at least 270 out of 538) is declared the winner.


Despite its historical significance, the Electoral College has faced criticism and calls for reform. One central point of contention is the possibility of a candidate winning the presidency without securing the popular vote, as occurred in the 1876, 1888, 2000, and 2016 U.S. presidential elections.


Critics argue that this discrepancy undermines the principle of 'one person, one vote' and can lead to outcomes that do not accurately reflect the will of the people. Additionally, the winner-takes-all system has been criticized for discouraging voter turnout in non-swing states, where the outcome is often deemed to be predetermined. These states, known as 'safe states,' are typically where one political party consistently wins, leading to a perception that individual votes in these states may not have a significant impact on the overall election result.


Proposals for reforming or abolishing the Electoral College have been debated for decades. Some advocate for a proportional allocation of electoral votes based on the popular vote within each state, arguing that this would better reflect the will of the people. On the other hand, others support adopting a national popular vote system, where the candidate with the most votes nationwide would win the presidency, believing that this would ensure a more democratic outcome. It's important to note that both sides of the debate have valid points, and the decision ultimately rests on the values and priorities of the American people.


Efforts to amend or abolish the Electoral College, a system deeply rooted in the U.S. Constitution, face significant hurdles. Any changes would require a constitutional amendment, a process notoriously difficult that requires the approval of two-thirds of both houses of Congress and three-fourths of the states. This complexity underscores the importance and impact of the Electoral College in our political system.

bottom of page